Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Walworth County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 387
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Walworth County, Wisconsin totaled $3,029,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Robert Condon & Sons Inc | East Troy, WI 53120 | $10,130 |
102 | Ricochet Farms Inc | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $10,108 |
103 | Kevin L Papenfus | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $10,055 |
104 | James A Leedle | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $9,844 |
105 | Richard Thelen | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $9,815 |
106 | Dale N Albrecht | Sharon, WI 53585 | $9,745 |
107 | Donald L Ahrens | Walworth, WI 53184 | $9,638 |
108 | Beetstra Family Farm LLC | Sharon, WI 53585 | $9,557 |
109 | Robert W Reese | Walworth, WI 53184 | $9,498 |
110 | Lone Oak Angus LLC | Brookfield, WI 53045 | $9,355 |
111 | William J Leonard & Sons Inc | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $9,339 |
112 | Chester E Lininger | Burlington, WI 53105 | $8,669 |
113 | Etten Farms Inc | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $8,589 |
114 | Robert J Cook | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $8,558 |
115 | Schmaling Farm Inc | Delavan, WI 53115 | $8,541 |
116 | David G Mathesius | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $8,134 |
117 | Jeffrey J Ehlen | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $8,064 |
118 | Robert D Nelson | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $7,962 |
119 | Van Dell Farms Inc | Sharon, WI 53585 | $7,937 |
120 | Deakins Back Nine Dairy LLC | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $7,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”