Farm Subsidy information
Walworth County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Walworth County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 631
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Walworth County, Wisconsin totaled $12,538,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Clark Farms Of Elkhorn Inc | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $14,808 |
122 | Michael J Morgan | Burlington, WI 53105 | $14,802 |
123 | Eric Taylor | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $14,789 |
124 | Jacob J Ehlen | Genoa City, WI 53128 | $14,789 |
125 | Mike Cerny | Sharon, WI 53585 | $14,741 |
126 | Dennis Ames | Darien, WI 53114 | $14,537 |
127 | Interchange Properties LLC | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $14,460 |
128 | Ray E Mcmanaway | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $14,012 |
129 | Richard Thelen | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $14,004 |
130 | Benjamin D Nelson | East Troy, WI 53120 | $13,932 |
131 | Peter Meyer | Darien, WI 53114 | $13,594 |
132 | Lone Oak Angus LLC | Brookfield, WI 53045 | $13,550 |
133 | Kadlec Enterprises LLC | Sharon, WI 53585 | $13,370 |
134 | Rock & Knoll Acres LLC | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $13,315 |
135 | Dale N Albrecht | Sharon, WI 53585 | $13,289 |
136 | Chester E Lininger | Burlington, WI 53105 | $13,009 |
137 | Patrick R Mccormick | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $12,732 |
138 | Ellis Farms Inc | Walworth, WI 53184 | $12,648 |
139 | Ronald Lipinsky | Sharon, WI 53585 | $12,621 |
140 | Robert D Nelson | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $12,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”