Total Conservation Programs in Walworth County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 933
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Walworth County, Wisconsin totaled $14,466,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shadel Ridge Farms Inc | Delavan, WI 53115 | $102,027 |
22 | James Dowling | Burlington, WI 53105 | $98,459 |
23 | Slavin Sisters Farm LLC | Walworth, WI 53184 | $95,709 |
24 | Sally's Marsh Hunting Club Inc | Delafield, WI 53018 | $91,301 |
25 | Thomas R Woellert | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $89,614 |
26 | Frank Taylor | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $87,825 |
27 | Baumeister Blue Ridge Inc | Burlington, WI 53105 | $87,664 |
28 | The Duane G & Shirley M Kurth Rev | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $85,415 |
29 | Ronald Twist | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $81,476 |
30 | Duane B Clark | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $80,960 |
31 | Kurt H Bayer | Lake Geneva, WI 53147 | $79,764 |
32 | Barbara A Donahue | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $77,851 |
33 | Florence M Williams | Pewaukee, WI 53072 | $76,791 |
34 | Susan K Bellman | Delavan, WI 53115 | $76,208 |
35 | Riemond H Jr & Sharon L Rippel Revocable Trust | Burlington, WI 53105 | $76,192 |
36 | Norman Robers | Burlington, WI 53105 | $75,596 |
37 | Holt Brothers Inc | Elkhorn, WI 53121 | $74,036 |
38 | Donald S Huml | Boca Grande, FL 33921 | $73,186 |
39 | Shirley Overbeek | Delavan, WI 53115 | $73,037 |
40 | Michael Maciosek | East Troy, WI 53120 | $72,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”