Farm Subsidy information
Wood County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Wood County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wood County, Wisconsin totaled $7,750,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arendt Cranberry Co | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $345,267 |
2 | Wisconsin Moss Co Inc | Babcock, WI 54413 | $277,510 |
3 | Gardner Cranberry LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $209,734 |
4 | Wisconsin River Cranberry Co LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $156,893 |
5 | Central Vegetable Farm LLC | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $149,793 |
6 | Owl Creek Cranberries LLC | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $128,312 |
7 | Aa Vegetable Farms Inc | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $125,000 |
8 | Veedum Cranberry LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $121,111 |
9 | , | $91,004 | |
10 | Benjamin L Grimm | Arpin, WI 54410 | $87,286 |
11 | Dempze Cranberry Company Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $82,602 |
12 | Hemlock Trails Cranberry Co | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $73,594 |
13 | Seneca Red Cranberry Co LLC | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $71,689 |
14 | Autumn Cranberries LLC | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $70,274 |
15 | Jepson Cranberry LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $62,783 |
16 | Sherry Berry LLC | Milladore, WI 54454 | $61,342 |
17 | Fanning Cranberry Company Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $61,143 |
18 | Rodney Brockman Cranberries LLC | Babcock, WI 54413 | $60,288 |
19 | B & R Cranberry LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $57,872 |
20 | , | $55,870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>