Total Commodity Programs in Wood County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 520
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wood County, Wisconsin totaled $18,827,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wisconsin Moss Co Inc | Babcock, WI 54413 | $104,309 |
42 | Hoffmann Bros Farms Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $103,778 |
43 | City Point Cranberries Llp | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $103,566 |
44 | Allen E Grassl | Rudolph, WI 54475 | $102,707 |
45 | Potter & Son Inc | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $99,945 |
46 | Brian Vruwink | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $98,142 |
47 | Bells' Runway Acres LLC | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $95,530 |
48 | Bennett Cranberry Co Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $93,106 |
49 | Charles L Schuld | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $88,079 |
50 | Kevin G Breu | Auburndale, WI 54412 | $87,212 |
51 | Daniel J Dorshorst | Arpin, WI 54410 | $85,783 |
52 | Linda R Behling | Milladore, WI 54454 | $84,944 |
53 | Nekoosa Marsh LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $84,778 |
54 | Fait Farms Inc | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $81,201 |
55 | Lester Cranberry Co Inc | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $80,228 |
56 | Douglas J Vruwink | Milladore, WI 54454 | $78,792 |
57 | Gary T Nieman | Arpin, WI 54410 | $78,546 |
58 | Roger Ott Farms Inc | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $77,495 |
59 | Eric W Gerlach | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $75,645 |
60 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $73,877 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”