Farm Subsidy information
Hot Springs County, Wyoming
Total Subsidies in Hot Springs County, Wyoming, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 77
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hot Springs County, Wyoming totaled $901,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Asa Thomas Stothart | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $3,051 |
42 | Curtis Rush | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,544 |
43 | Michael W Ready | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,520 |
44 | Rita Thronburg-johnson | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,410 |
45 | Flagstone Ranch LLC | Shoshoni, WY 82649 | $2,365 |
46 | Penny Jannell Day | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,244 |
47 | Lenard Leroy Shumway | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,235 |
48 | Mcneff Double Bar C Ranch, Inc | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $2,175 |
49 | Mike Kimsey | Manderson, WY 82432 | $2,157 |
50 | Martinez Ranch LLC | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,834 |
51 | Joe L Bentley | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,533 |
52 | Barry W Nye | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,421 |
53 | Hd Quarter Circle Ranch LLC | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,321 |
54 | Merrill Ready | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,302 |
55 | Moline Legacy | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,218 |
56 | Barbara Rice | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $1,081 |
57 | Delbert Daniels | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $983 |
58 | Donald D Mccumber | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $947 |
59 | Billie Jo Norsworthy | Thermopolis, WY 82443 | $889 |
60 | Charles Herbst | Shoshoni, WY 82649 | $865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”