Total Disaster Programs in Niobrara County, Wyoming, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 563
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Niobrara County, Wyoming totaled $31,328,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Justen P Miller | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $116,364 |
82 | Kruse Cattle LLC | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $116,077 |
83 | Brian Zerbe | Lusk, WY 82225 | $116,076 |
84 | Gregory B Starck | Lusk, WY 82225 | $113,491 |
85 | Gene F Lenz | Lusk, WY 82225 | $113,296 |
86 | Justin W Kremers | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $111,989 |
87 | Ronald Shoults | Van Tassell, WY 82242 | $111,263 |
88 | Ed Ginkens | Harrison, NE 69346 | $108,662 |
89 | David Dennis Vetter | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $107,633 |
90 | Arleen Jackson York | Lusk, WY 82225 | $107,152 |
91 | Daniel Goddard | Lusk, WY 82225 | $103,838 |
92 | Monty L Finley | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $101,952 |
93 | Bar C F Livestock LLC | Lusk, WY 82225 | $101,307 |
94 | Rawhide Livestock Inc | Van Tassell, WY 82242 | $100,560 |
95 | Andrew W Greer | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $100,503 |
96 | Daniel - Daniel & Cheryl Gaukel Living T Gaukel | Keeline, WY 82227 | $99,586 |
97 | Glenn E Southwick | Jay Em, WY 82219 | $98,406 |
98 | Robert L Freeman | Keeline, WY 82227 | $96,970 |
99 | Andrew Wasserburger | Lusk, WY 82225 | $96,593 |
100 | Hat Creek Livestock Inc | Lusk, WY 82225 | $95,307 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”