Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Niobrara County, Wyoming, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 202
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Niobrara County, Wyoming totaled $3,884,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Barbara H York | Lusk, WY 82225 | $10,065 |
102 | J Lazy P Ranch LLC | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $9,934 |
103 | Samuel Tye Reed | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $9,883 |
104 | Joel D Wasserburger | Lusk, WY 82225 | $9,845 |
105 | Glenn E Southwick | Jay Em, WY 82219 | $9,570 |
106 | Lee Lamb | Lusk, WY 82225 | $9,350 |
107 | Nathan Lane | Douglas, WY 82633 | $9,350 |
108 | Dakota Nate Forkner | Lusk, WY 82225 | $9,350 |
109 | Lone Crow Cattle Co LLC | Rio Vista, CA 94571 | $9,317 |
110 | Kurt Gaukel | Keeline, WY 82227 | $9,259 |
111 | Cody J Stewart | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $9,075 |
112 | Wyoco Livestock LLC | Lusk, WY 82225 | $9,020 |
113 | William L Mccleerey | Manville, WY 82227 | $8,979 |
114 | Bryce Sturman | Lusk, WY 82225 | $8,918 |
115 | John Richard Sampers | Lusk, WY 82225 | $8,745 |
116 | Jack Miskimins | Van Tassell, WY 82242 | $8,580 |
117 | Daniel - Daniel & Cheryl Gaukel Living T Gaukel | Keeline, WY 82227 | $8,412 |
118 | Maryevelyn J Krejci | Lance Creek, WY 82222 | $7,970 |
119 | Royce Heine | Keeline, WY 82227 | $7,867 |
120 | David C Birch | Keeline, WY 82227 | $7,851 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”