Emergency Conservation Program in Sublette County, Wyoming, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Sublette County, Wyoming totaled $384,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rolling Thunder Ranch LLC | Mayfield, NY 12117 | $67,864 |
2 | Miller Land And Livestock Corporation | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $66,179 |
3 | G & E Livestock Inc | Farson, WY 82932 | $44,747 |
4 | Barney Ranches Inc | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $41,095 |
5 | Midland Livestock Company | Rock Springs, WY 82902 | $25,927 |
6 | Rocking Chair Cattle Company | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $19,582 |
7 | Dunton Sheep Company | Rock Springs, WY 82902 | $13,316 |
8 | Grindstone Cattle Company | Daniel, WY 83115 | $11,381 |
9 | Patricia Burroughs | Bondurant, WY 82922 | $11,344 |
10 | William Murdock | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $10,542 |
11 | Murdock Land And Livestock Co. | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $10,162 |
12 | J F Ranch Inc | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $6,937 |
13 | James T Noble | Cora, WY 82925 | $6,630 |
14 | Alsade Limited | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $5,211 |
15 | Circle Cattle Company | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $4,248 |
16 | Pam Chrisman | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $4,240 |
17 | Michael Hughes | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $3,942 |
18 | Cross Lazy Two Land & Livestock I | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $3,880 |
19 | Wapika Ranch LLC | Pinedale, WY 82941 | $3,686 |
20 | Wilma Davis | Big Piney, WY 83113 | $3,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>