Total Commodity Programs in Washakie County, Wyoming, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 139
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washakie County, Wyoming totaled $1,461,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert James Shelton | Worland, WY 82401 | $11,527 |
42 | Luke Lungren | Worland, WY 82401 | $11,285 |
43 | Dellos Farms Inc | Worland, WY 82401 | $11,220 |
44 | Sage Creek Land & Cattle II, LLC | Worland, WY 82401 | $11,134 |
45 | Michael Vigil Farms Inc | Manderson, WY 82432 | $11,031 |
46 | Falling Springs Ranch LLC | Covington, VA 24426 | $10,877 |
47 | Dana Lewton | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $10,865 |
48 | Nine Iron Feedlot | Worland, WY 82401 | $10,701 |
49 | Clark Enterprises Inc | Worland, WY 82401 | $10,650 |
50 | Clinton Breeden Living Trust, Dated January 18, 20 | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $10,242 |
51 | Propp Farms | Worland, WY 82401 | $10,237 |
52 | Mark Redland | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $10,156 |
53 | Mascaro Farms LLC, | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $9,746 |
54 | South Flat Land & Livestock III LLC | Worland, WY 82401 | $9,261 |
55 | Bjornestad Land & Cattle LLC | Manderson, WY 82432 | $9,017 |
56 | Double H Ranch | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $8,650 |
57 | Broken Back Ranch Co Inc | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $8,131 |
58 | Starbuck Ranch LLC | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $7,509 |
59 | Brewster Ranch Lp | Ten Sleep, WY 82442 | $7,013 |
60 | Pamela Holland | Worland, WY 82401 | $6,801 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”