Farm Subsidy information
Weston County, Wyoming
Total Subsidies in Weston County, Wyoming, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 492
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Weston County, Wyoming totaled $51,997,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jonathon Michael Carr | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $213,014 |
62 | Perino Ranch Partnership | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $211,678 |
63 | Gerry Carr | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $200,350 |
64 | Phillip T Holmes | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $197,886 |
65 | Charles M Pzinski | Four Corners, WY 82715 | $197,338 |
66 | Turkey Track Ranch LLC | Upton, WY 82730 | $196,620 |
67 | Shepperson Livestock | Upton, WY 82730 | $195,368 |
68 | Ivan Brovont | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $193,421 |
69 | Stanley E Pzinski Jr | Four Corners, WY 82715 | $192,995 |
70 | Geraldine E Mirich | Upton, WY 82730 | $184,218 |
71 | Circle Nine Cattle Company | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $181,422 |
72 | Taft Ranch | Upton, WY 82730 | $181,367 |
73 | , | $180,941 | |
74 | Preston Perino | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $176,908 |
75 | Howard White Dba Wyoming Equality Fiberwork | Upton, WY 82730 | $171,839 |
76 | Corbin Nicolls | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $169,037 |
77 | James R Darlington | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $161,467 |
78 | Dyesville Angus LLC | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $160,973 |
79 | Janet M Perino | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $160,583 |
80 | Wade Perino | Newcastle, WY 82701 | $157,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”