Farm Subsidy information
Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,409
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $48,483,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dya Del Sur | Ponce, PR 00732 | $241,626 |
22 | Carlos L Gonzalez Vargas | Ensenada, PR 00647 | $236,012 |
23 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $234,153 |
24 | Ms Mango Farm Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $233,228 |
25 | Moises Davila Nieves | Aguirre, PR 00704 | $232,188 |
26 | Agroempresas Atabey Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $217,805 |
27 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $214,184 |
28 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $212,917 |
29 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $205,878 |
30 | Luis A Ramirez Vazquez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $203,854 |
31 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $202,700 |
32 | Hacienda Ramirez Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $193,209 |
33 | Tropical Farm Corp | Lares, PR 00669 | $182,226 |
34 | R.r.a. Farm LLC | Moca, PR 00676 | $177,361 |
35 | Santiago Giovanetti Justiniano | Maricao, PR 00606 | $177,178 |
36 | Guillermo J Quintana Gonzalez | Lares, PR 00669 | $177,114 |
37 | Andres Rodriguez-morejon | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $168,816 |
38 | Santiago Giovanetti Fuster | Maricao, PR 00606 | $167,894 |
39 | Wilson Perez Perez | Adjuntas, PR 00601 | $167,204 |
40 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $166,982 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”