Farm Subsidy information
Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 461
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $4,101,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hacienda Rosa Ana Inc | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $32,993 |
22 | Henry Steidel Navarro | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $32,568 |
23 | Martex Las Carolinas LLC | Salinas, PR 00751 | $32,343 |
24 | Vaqueria La Modelo Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $31,957 |
25 | Corporacion Agricola Haciendas De Jaicoa Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $31,447 |
26 | Carlos J Ruiz Torres | Lares, PR 00669 | $31,320 |
27 | Hacienda Toledo Ramos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $30,931 |
28 | Javier Roman Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $29,461 |
29 | Cesar L De Jesus-ortiz | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $28,950 |
30 | Gilberto Santiago Luciano | Corozal, PR 00783 | $28,310 |
31 | Steffany Ruiz Laboy | Maricao, PR 00606 | $28,203 |
32 | Francisco Ramos Perez | Castaner, PR 00631 | $27,748 |
33 | Berros Tainos Inc | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $27,367 |
34 | Carlos R Cardona Ocasio | Patillas, PR 00723 | $27,140 |
35 | Jesus Ramos Rivera | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $27,115 |
36 | Teodoro F Alfonzo Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $26,896 |
37 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $26,656 |
38 | Tai South Farms Inc | Lajas, PR 00667 | $26,572 |
39 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $25,940 |
40 | Rene Cruz Pena | Lares, PR 00669 | $25,445 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”