Farm Subsidy information
Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,998
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $78,338,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $262,253 | |
22 | Antonio T Medina Torres | Lares, PR 00669 | $262,068 |
23 | Wilfredo Ruiz Feliciano | Maricao, PR 00606 | $261,875 |
24 | , | $261,175 | |
25 | Nelson Diaz Ramos | Lares, PR 00669 | $261,046 |
26 | Jorge Rullan Sanchez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $260,524 |
27 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $257,816 |
28 | Carlos B Vega-belen | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $253,909 |
29 | Finca El Paraiso Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $253,488 |
30 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $253,233 |
31 | Marcos Santiago Padilla | Ponce, PR 00728 | $246,192 |
32 | Prm Specialty Coffee LLC | San Juan, PR 00918 | $242,463 |
33 | Fincas Luis Roig Inc | Yauco, PR 00698 | $242,078 |
34 | Hacienda Los Eucaliptos Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $232,146 |
35 | Francisco Ramos Perez | Castaner, PR 00631 | $231,261 |
36 | Gan Eden Farm Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $230,876 |
37 | Daniel Torres Feliciano | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $230,283 |
38 | Joseph Giuliani-giorgi | Guayanilla, PR 00656 | $228,530 |
39 | Angel L Velez Perez | Lares, PR 00669 | $227,300 |
40 | Hacienda Maderylis Inc | Bayamon, PR 00960 | $224,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”