Emergency Conservation Program in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 144
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $736,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Angel Luis Rivera Nieves | Naranjito, PR 00719 | $2,337 |
82 | Eloy Santiago Vientos | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $2,337 |
83 | Guillermo S Oliver Prefasi | Yauco, PR 00698 | $2,319 |
84 | Vaqueria La Modelo Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,303 |
85 | , | $2,280 | |
86 | , | $2,246 | |
87 | , | $2,246 | |
88 | Rafael Angel Perez Medina | Camuy, PR 00627 | $2,236 |
89 | Elizabeth Rosario Medina | Utuado, PR 00641 | $2,063 |
90 | Black Angus Farm Inc. | Hormigueros, PR 00660 | $2,063 |
91 | Emilia Soto Nieves | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,055 |
92 | J & M Agricola, Inc. | Manati, PR 00674 | $2,038 |
93 | Freddie A Rivera Velez | Corozal, PR 00783 | $1,968 |
94 | Luis Felipe Alvarado Alvarado | Orocovis, PR 00720 | $1,958 |
95 | Gustavo Rivera Lopez | Barranquitas, PR 00794 | $1,878 |
96 | Marcos Martinez Gonzalez | Lajas, PR 00667 | $1,875 |
97 | , | $1,875 | |
98 | Nestor Ruiz Leon | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $1,808 |
99 | Samuel Ubinas Roman | Aguadilla, PR 00603 | $1,800 |
100 | Carmen Lydia Sierra Morales | Orocovis, PR 00720 | $1,716 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”