Farm Subsidy information
Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,998
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $78,338,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Finca La Cascada Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $146,505 |
102 | Anibal Gonzalez Velez | Castaner, PR 00631 | $145,473 |
103 | , | $144,998 | |
104 | Juan A Portalatin-ramos | Ponce, PR 00601 | $144,216 |
105 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $144,135 |
106 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $144,125 |
107 | Angel Ribot Rullan | Lares, PR 00669 | $143,998 |
108 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $143,517 |
109 | Ramon Santiago-ramirez | Castaner, PR 00631 | $143,460 |
110 | Ramon Santiago Rivera | Villalba, PR 00766 | $143,225 |
111 | Eufemio Rivera Ares | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $142,762 |
112 | Manuel A Torres Casiano | Yauco, PR 00698 | $142,697 |
113 | , | $142,307 | |
114 | Guillermo Molina Santiago | Barranquitas, PR 00794 | $142,238 |
115 | Jose R Martinez Coello | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $142,064 |
116 | Maria E Rodriguez Velez | Yauco, PR 00698 | $140,350 |
117 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $140,047 |
118 | David Rodriguez-rodriguez | Yauco, PR 00698 | $139,941 |
119 | 2 Melons Inc. | Aguirre, PR 00704 | $139,549 |
120 | Jose L Perez-torres | Adjuntas, PR 00601 | $139,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”