Total Commodity Programs in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 299
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $2,837,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Rafael A Lopez Lopez | Camuy, PR 00627 | $9,403 |
102 | El Farmer Inc | Isabela, PR 00662 | $9,210 |
103 | Vaqueria Santa Maria Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $9,147 |
104 | Ba Dairy Farm Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $9,116 |
105 | Saul Lebron-lebron | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $9,047 |
106 | Juan J Morales Martinez | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $9,047 |
107 | Hector Manuel Arroyo Torres | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $9,047 |
108 | Vaqueria Rivera Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $9,031 |
109 | , | $8,942 | |
110 | Ganaderia Del Turabo Inc | Guaynabo, PR 00966 | $8,648 |
111 | R Garcia Kpak Dairy Farm LLC | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $8,573 |
112 | Galimarys Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $8,324 |
113 | Hugo A Martinez Reyes | Camuy, PR 00627 | $8,319 |
114 | Empresas Agricolas Aulet Inc | San Juan, PR 00907 | $8,266 |
115 | Gladys Diana Hilerio Del Rio | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $8,135 |
116 | Edwin Cardona Mendez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $8,101 |
117 | Vaqueria Grj Incorporated | Humacao, PR 00791 | $8,067 |
118 | Ganaderia Jimenez LLC | Camuy, PR 00627 | $8,041 |
119 | Gilberto Gonzalez Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $7,904 |
120 | Vaqueria La Fe Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $7,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”