Emergency Conservation Program in Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 484
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $1,960,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rene Cruz Pena | Lares, PR 00669 | $14,552 |
22 | Edwin Acevedo Castillo | Maricao, PR 00606 | $14,238 |
23 | Ricardo Giuliani Marietti | Coto Laurel, PR 00780 | $14,022 |
24 | Fidencio Sanchez Taveras | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $13,493 |
25 | Luis E Alcover Colon | Lares, PR 00669 | $12,927 |
26 | Angel D Morales Velez | Lares, PR 00669 | $12,817 |
27 | Natividad Velez Irizarry | Mayaguez, PR 00681 | $12,524 |
28 | Hector M Otero Montes | Ciales, PR 00638 | $12,447 |
29 | Jose Orlando Beltran Virella | Barranquitas, PR 00794 | $12,397 |
30 | Empresas Norhen Inc | Aguadilla, PR 00605 | $12,122 |
31 | Fenelson Farm Corporation | Dorado, PR 00646 | $11,904 |
32 | Ernesto Cuevas-borrero | Penuelas, PR 00624 | $11,740 |
33 | Confesor Rivera Pitre | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $11,740 |
34 | Reed Paul Hepperly Mignucci | Mayaguez, PR 00682 | $11,411 |
35 | Finca Magdalena S E | Aguirre, PR 00704 | $11,357 |
36 | Jose Colon Garcia | Orocovis, PR 00720 | $11,320 |
37 | Santiago Giovanetti Fuster | Maricao, PR 00606 | $10,842 |
38 | Luis A Vega Rosario | Ciales, PR 00638 | $10,718 |
39 | Roberto Atienza Ramos | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $10,225 |
40 | Angel L Velez Perez | Lares, PR 00669 | $10,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”