Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $404,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dya Del Sur | Ponce, PR 00732 | $69,336 |
2 | Jose F Soto Soto | Camuy, PR 00627 | $49,896 |
3 | Jose M Rodriguez Alsina | Cayey, PR 00737 | $38,826 |
4 | Gina T Cuevas Maldonado | Utuado, PR 00641 | $34,020 |
5 | Carlos J Ruiz Torres | Lares, PR 00669 | $31,320 |
6 | Corporacion Agricola Haciendas De Jaicoa Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $29,646 |
7 | Gilberto Santiago Luciano | Corozal, PR 00783 | $27,378 |
8 | Agueybana A Iv Vale Pabon | Moca, PR 00676 | $25,110 |
9 | Jorge A Ruiz Mendez | Lares, PR 00669 | $23,058 |
10 | Roberto Javier Berrios Vazquez | Barranquitas, PR 00794 | $22,140 |
11 | Granja Loma Linda Corp | Mayaguez, PR 00682 | $15,390 |
12 | , | $9,990 | |
13 | Granja Canais Corporacion | Cidra, PR 00739 | $8,424 |
14 | Javier Bermudez Gonzalez | Utuado, PR 00641 | $4,860 |
15 | , | $4,860 | |
16 | Noel Torres Mendez | Moca, PR 00676 | $4,266 |
17 | Jose M Mendez Botti | Aguada, PR 00602 | $2,268 |
18 | Samuel Pantojas Dejesus | Vega Alta, PR 00692 | $1,620 |
19 | Miguel A Marrero Torres | Barranquitas, PR 00794 | $1,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”