Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Puerto Rico, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 242
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $499,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $4,459 |
| 22 | Gladys Diana Hilerio Del Rio | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $4,338 |
| 23 | Javier Barreto Mena | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $4,173 |
| 24 | Lucena Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $4,090 |
| 25 | Nelson Ramos Irizarry | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $4,019 |
| 26 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,633 |
| 27 | El Farmer Inc | Isabela, PR 00662 | $3,376 |
| 28 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,343 |
| 29 | Abraham Reyes Navarro | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $3,135 |
| 30 | Bayaney Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,084 |
| 31 | Empresas Benitez Toledo Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $3,011 |
| 32 | La Pica Pica Dairy Farm, Corp | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,961 |
| 33 | Rio Nuevo Farms Inc | Toa Baja, PR 00951 | $2,935 |
| 34 | Ganaderia J E Inc | Caguas, PR 00726 | $2,855 |
| 35 | Vaqueria Luis F. Fernandez Perez Inc. | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,847 |
| 36 | Mariana Farm Corp. | San Juan, PR 00922 | $2,671 |
| 37 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $2,603 |
| 38 | Eiramil Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $2,590 |
| 39 | Rosa M Garcia Candelaria | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $2,514 |
| 40 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $2,494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf