Total Commodity Programs in Puerto Rico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,099
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $131,973,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $2,275,398 |
| 2 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $1,365,545 |
| 3 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $1,034,644 |
| 4 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $935,828 |
| 5 | Martex Farms S E | Carolina, PR 00984 | $910,643 |
| 6 | Finca Luciana, Inc. | Lares, PR 00669 | $884,965 |
| 7 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $870,508 |
| 8 | Rico Banana Inc | Cayey, PR 00736 | $776,874 |
| 9 | Gan Eden Farm Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $767,024 |
| 10 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $734,332 |
| 11 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $657,864 |
| 12 | Lucena Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $627,021 |
| 13 | Q Development Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $623,950 |
| 14 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $564,759 |
| 15 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $536,901 |
| 16 | Rio Nuevo Farms Inc | Toa Baja, PR 00951 | $529,492 |
| 17 | Juan Pagan Caraballo | Yauco, PR 00698 | $500,000 |
| 18 | Jjj Ranch Inc | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $500,000 |
| 19 | Bananera Costa Sur Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $500,000 |
| 20 | Campo Alegre LLC | San Juan, PR 00918 | $500,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf