Emergency Conservation Program in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $100,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alexis Zaragoza Urdaz | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $17,611 |
2 | , | $13,485 | |
3 | Frutos De La Tierra Arcelai, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $12,949 |
4 | , | $10,423 | |
5 | Hector M Otero Montes | Ciales, PR 00638 | $7,213 |
6 | Ramon Rios Alicea | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $5,612 |
7 | , | $5,057 | |
8 | Roberto A Otero Montes | Ciales, PR 00638 | $3,371 |
9 | , | $3,371 | |
10 | Wilfredo Santiago Aleman | Lares, PR 00669 | $3,202 |
11 | Rafael Lopez Gonzalez | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,537 |
12 | Angel L Rivera Hernandez | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $2,537 |
13 | Stephanie Rodriguez Ocasio | Ciales, PR 00638 | $2,401 |
14 | , | $1,703 | |
15 | Felix E Class Vega | Morovis, PR 00687 | $1,686 |
16 | , | $1,653 | |
17 | Humberto Molina Negron | Morovis, PR 00687 | $1,601 |
18 | Jose Angel Garcia Valle | Vega Baja, PR 00694 | $1,601 |
19 | Irving Garcia Rosario | Vega Baja, PR 00693 | $800 |
20 | Ramon Russe Gonzalez | Morovis, PR 00687 | $602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>