Dairy Programs in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 256
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $31,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ramon Talavera Mora | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $318,464 |
22 | Teodoro F Alfonzo Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $312,300 |
23 | Empresas Agricolas Aulet Inc | San Juan, PR 00907 | $308,295 |
24 | T J Dairy Farms Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $305,163 |
25 | Campo Alegre Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $297,134 |
26 | Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $295,424 |
27 | Empresas Benitez Toledo Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $288,328 |
28 | Galateo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $286,044 |
29 | Eiramil Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $283,890 |
30 | Luis D Hernandez Rivera | Camuy, PR 00627 | $283,449 |
31 | Javier Barreto Mena | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $280,472 |
32 | Las Nubes Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $275,970 |
33 | Agricola Juncos Inc | Ciales, PR 00638 | $269,276 |
34 | Vaquerias Emilio Velez Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $250,950 |
35 | Las Palmas Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $249,249 |
36 | Rejo Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $240,463 |
37 | Alberto J Toledo Delgado | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $234,047 |
38 | Benjamin Rodriguez Ramos | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $233,090 |
39 | Delgado Peraza Dairy Farm, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $229,589 |
40 | Brothers Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $227,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”