Dairy Programs in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 256
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $31,950,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $1,190,978 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,188,711 |
3 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $976,377 |
4 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $733,447 |
5 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $689,283 |
6 | Lucena Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $591,061 |
7 | Q Development Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $546,025 |
8 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $521,332 |
9 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $510,335 |
10 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $500,223 |
11 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $499,599 |
12 | Luna Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $421,742 |
13 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $414,792 |
14 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $399,203 |
15 | Hatillo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $387,803 |
16 | Ivan F Martinez Torres | Camuy, PR 00627 | $355,115 |
17 | Alberto Del Rio Soto | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $353,669 |
18 | 1940 Jackson Family Farms LLC | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $351,262 |
19 | Bayaney Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $319,532 |
20 | Rafael A Lopez Lopez | Camuy, PR 00627 | $319,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>