Dairy Programs in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 129
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $7,434,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $250,362 |
2 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $233,526 |
3 | 1940 Jackson Family Farms LLC | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $202,300 |
4 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $124,176 |
5 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $124,084 |
6 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $123,710 |
7 | Q Development Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $123,642 |
8 | Lucena Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $122,437 |
9 | Galateo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $122,068 |
10 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $121,872 |
11 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $121,512 |
12 | Bayaney Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $121,191 |
13 | , | $119,361 | |
14 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $119,297 |
15 | Luna Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $117,040 |
16 | R Garcia Kpak Dairy Farm LLC | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $115,245 |
17 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $115,127 |
18 | Eiramil Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $114,411 |
19 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $114,333 |
20 | Empresas Benitez Toledo Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $109,466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>