Total Emergency Relief Program in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 44
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $1,492,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jose A La Luz Gonzalez | Ciales, PR 00638 | $125,000 |
2 | Ivette M Pagan Rivera | Ciales, PR 00638 | $125,000 |
3 | Campo Alegre LLC | San Juan, PR 00918 | $125,000 |
4 | Hacienda Cobar Inc | Ciales, PR 00638 | $113,335 |
5 | Hector M Otero Montes | Ciales, PR 00638 | $92,532 |
6 | Lineas Verdes Hidro Inc | Ciales, PR 00638 | $89,463 |
7 | Alexis Zaragoza Urdaz | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $57,644 |
8 | Sucn Juan Ostolaza Quintana | Ciales, PR 00638 | $48,822 |
9 | Antonio Rivera Gonzalez | Ciales, PR 00638 | $48,383 |
10 | , | $42,213 | |
11 | Hector G Rivera Laureano | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $41,514 |
12 | Carmen N Figueroa Colon | Ciales, PR 00638 | $41,355 |
13 | Emanuel Gonzalez Nieves | Quebradillas, PR 00678 | $40,226 |
14 | Israel Nieves Morales | Ciales, PR 00638 | $40,100 |
15 | Benjamin Miranda Morales | Ciales, PR 00638 | $38,496 |
16 | Roberto A Otero Montes | Ciales, PR 00638 | $36,392 |
17 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Aguilar | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $28,077 |
18 | Ivan M Rosa Santiago | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $27,104 |
19 | Angel Rodriguez Nieves Estate | Ciales, PR 00638 | $26,463 |
20 | , | $25,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>