Farm Subsidy information
Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $3,206,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Angel Lozada Lopez | Humacao, PR 00791 | $40,999 |
22 | , | $39,183 | |
23 | Hacienda El Nuevo Amanecer LLC | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $38,942 |
24 | Mendoza Benitez Dairy Inc | Rio Blanco, PR 00744 | $37,587 |
25 | Juan C Rivera Serrano | Cayey, PR 00736 | $37,159 |
26 | David Aponte Cruz | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $35,612 |
27 | Luis Angel Rodriguez Ortiz | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $34,187 |
28 | Jose Ramon Rivera Claudio | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $33,828 |
29 | , | $32,996 | |
30 | Luis A Pinto Cruz | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $32,272 |
31 | Finca La Travesia, LLC | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $30,811 |
32 | , | $29,539 | |
33 | Efren A Rotger Melendez | Rio Blanco, PR 00744 | $29,329 |
34 | , | $28,096 | |
35 | Jardines Morales Exterior, Inc. | Trujillo Alto, PR 00977 | $26,836 |
36 | Finca La Vega Inc | Cayey, PR 00736 | $25,726 |
37 | Josue Pinto Inc | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $25,535 |
38 | Carlos Morales Tirado | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $24,676 |
39 | Jose M Flores Baez | Caguas, PR 00725 | $23,651 |
40 | Oscar Sanchez Diaz | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $21,593 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”