Total Disaster Programs in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 109
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $1,784,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edgardo Ramirez Aguayo | San Juan, PR 00926 | $11,797 |
42 | Jose R Casanova Laboy | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $11,749 |
43 | Centro Agricola La Muralla, Corp. | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $11,498 |
44 | Rafael Morales Morales | Rio Grande, PR 00745 | $11,239 |
45 | Juan C Rivera Serrano | Cayey, PR 00736 | $11,236 |
46 | Angel M Morales Rodriguez | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $11,180 |
47 | Maria Esther Zapata Rivera | Caguas, PR 00725 | $11,167 |
48 | Hacienda Belen Incorporado | Aguas Buenas, PR 00703 | $11,058 |
49 | Armando Sanchez Nazario | Arroyo, PR 00714 | $10,380 |
50 | Finca La Isleta, Inc. | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $9,615 |
51 | Julia Industries Group Inc | Caguas, PR 00726 | $9,386 |
52 | Rafael Jose Gomez Hernandez | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $9,335 |
53 | , | $9,240 | |
54 | Raimy Davila Nieves | Canovanas, PR 00729 | $8,910 |
55 | Hidrocultivos Carolinenses Inc | Carolina, PR 00987 | $8,530 |
56 | Kevin E Cruz Marquez | Humacao, PR 00791 | $8,377 |
57 | Hacienda Montesol, Inc. | Gurabo, PR 00778 | $8,128 |
58 | Jose A Rivera Rodriguez | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $8,013 |
59 | , | $8,013 | |
60 | Hector Omar Lopez Febo | Canovanas, PR 00729 | $7,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”