Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 164

Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $3,972,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments
1995-2023
1Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$224,314
2Angel Lozada LopezHumacao, PR 00791$170,157
3Maria D Cartagena Cartagena / DorCayey, PR 00737$168,843
4Marines D Torres RodriguezRio Grande, PR 00745$127,161
5Hector Rivera CruzGuaynabo, PR 00971$125,000
6Pennock Growers IncSan Juan, PR 00901$125,000
7Juan Diaz ColonAguas Buenas, PR 00703$124,205
8Angel Albela BoullonJuncos, PR 00777$119,703
9Jardines Morales Exterior, Inc.Trujillo Alto, PR 00977$106,188
10Jorge D Candelas TamayoCarolina, PR 00983$102,078
11Hidroponicos Del Pais IncCarolina, PR 00984$87,172
12Hacienda Belen IncorporadoAguas Buenas, PR 00703$83,144
13Rafael Morales MoralesRio Grande, PR 00745$82,644
14Hacienda Munoz Agro, Corp.San Lorenzo, PR 00754$74,880
15Hacienda De La Fe IncBrooklyn, NY 11226$71,318
16Jose Ramon Rivera ClaudioYabucoa, PR 00767$65,131
17Caribbean Cattle Company, Inc.San Juan, PR 00928$62,910
18Plantaciones Del Este, Corp.Caguas, PR 00726$62,130
19Ismael III Morales MendozaHumacao, PR 00791$61,228
20Anastacio Silva GomezSan Lorenzo, PR 00754$59,408

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag