Margin Protection Program in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $337,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $28,996 |
2 | Ganaderia J E Inc | Caguas, PR 00726 | $28,825 |
3 | Vaqueria Grj Incorporated | Humacao, PR 00791 | $21,616 |
4 | Juan R Gomez Flores | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $20,181 |
5 | Victor M Ayala Benitez | Humacao, PR 00792 | $17,283 |
6 | Stars Dairy Farm, Inc. | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $17,055 |
7 | La 31 Dairy Farm Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $16,630 |
8 | Jose R Coronas Rodriguez Inc | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $15,656 |
9 | Ganaderia Del Turabo Inc | Guaynabo, PR 00966 | $14,900 |
10 | Hacienda Em Inc | Rio Blanco, PR 00744 | $14,757 |
11 | Jose R Aponte Figueroa | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $13,178 |
12 | Vaqueria H E Inc | Humacao, PR 00792 | $12,889 |
13 | Pena Pobre Farm Inc | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $12,775 |
14 | Panet Mendoza, Inc | Rio Blanco, PR 00744 | $12,571 |
15 | Jose M Diaz Romero | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $12,295 |
16 | Jose J Ramos Vazquez | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $11,869 |
17 | Eugenio Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Las Piedras, PR 00771 | $9,082 |
18 | Mendoza Benitez Dairy Inc | Rio Blanco, PR 00744 | $8,162 |
19 | Ana Celia Vazquez Rivera | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $7,735 |
20 | Violeta Perez Gonzalez | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $6,560 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>