Farm Subsidy information
Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico
Total Subsidies in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $789,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hacienda Tio Cano Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $12,001 |
22 | Vaqueria Mi Sueno LLC | Moca, PR 00676 | $10,144 |
23 | , | $9,990 | |
24 | Miguel A Torres Mendez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $9,674 |
25 | Vaqueria Rivera Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $9,031 |
26 | Jose Acevedo Castillo | Lares, PR 00669 | $8,381 |
27 | Pedro Ramos Rivera | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $7,942 |
28 | Gilberto Gonzalez Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $7,904 |
29 | Vaqueria La Fe Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $7,579 |
30 | La Pica Pica Dairy Farm, Corp | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $7,506 |
31 | Jose J Rios Vega | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,776 |
32 | Vaqueria Fernandez Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,751 |
33 | Angel R Vargas Nieves | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,400 |
34 | Vaqueria J Varela Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,321 |
35 | Camilo J Roman Muniz | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,286 |
36 | Wilfredo Torres Negron | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $6,206 |
37 | Vaqueria Toro Negro Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $6,141 |
38 | Victor L Serrano Garcia | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $5,168 |
39 | , | $5,065 | |
40 | Productos Cartinami Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $4,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”