SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $254,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Finca Torres Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,657 |
22 | Martin Olavarria Ramos | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,331 |
23 | Angel L Velez Perez | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,195 |
24 | Jose Norberto Medina Pagan | Castaner, PR 00631 | $2,080 |
25 | Pedro A Gonzalez Rivera | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $1,993 |
26 | Heliodoro Aviles Lopez | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,966 |
27 | Juan A Lopez Custodio | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,756 |
28 | Primitivo A Gonzalez Acevedo | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,735 |
29 | Carlos J Ramos Ingles | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,243 |
30 | Juan Hernandez Velez | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,145 |
31 | Ricardo Gonzalez Gonzalez | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,094 |
32 | Fernando Latorre Crespo | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $852 |
33 | Ismael Ortiz Suarez | Corozal, PR 00823 | $691 |
34 | Radames Garcia Cruz | Castaner, PR 00631 | $669 |
35 | Segundo Soto Cruz | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $563 |
36 | Santos Garcia Colon | Lares, PR 00669 | $541 |
37 | Manuel De Jesus Velez Mendez | San Juan, PR 00923 | $328 |
38 | Domingo Quinonez Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $248 |
39 | Hector Feliciano Ramos | Lares, PR 00669 | $209 |
40 | Francisco Ramos Perez | Castaner, PR 00631 | $149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”