Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 133
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $530,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jorge E Alcover Rodriguez | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,732 |
62 | Ruben Ramos Acevedo | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,707 |
63 | Finca Centro Bravo Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,697 |
64 | Ramon Morales Pena | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,641 |
65 | Audeliz Padua Torres | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,610 |
66 | Martin Olavarria Ramos | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $2,572 |
67 | Ruben Acevedo Montes | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,436 |
68 | Daniel Acevedo Ramos | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,265 |
69 | Carlos Torres Roman | Lares, PR 00669 | $2,211 |
70 | , | $2,177 | |
71 | Anthony J Lopez Cardona | Moca, PR 00676 | $2,146 |
72 | , | $2,116 | |
73 | , | $2,013 | |
74 | Tomas De La Cruz | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,994 |
75 | Alfonso Trinidad Mejia | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,949 |
76 | , | $1,824 | |
77 | Carlos J Ramos Ingles | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,807 |
78 | , | $1,771 | |
79 | Jose L Ramos Lebron | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $1,717 |
80 | Cesar A Oliver Canabal | Lares, PR 00669 | $1,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”