Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 314

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $2,876,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Hacienda Ramirez IncSan Sebastian, PR 00685$193,209
2Hacienda Los Eucaliptos IncLares, PR 00669$120,333
3Pablo Rodriguez MoralesLares, PR 00669$98,749
4Empresas Agricolas Isaelis IncSan Sebastian, PR 00685$88,406
5Hydroponicos Del Grito IncLares, PR 00669$78,620
6Jose T Roman Barcelo Inc Dba Hidroponicos La CeibaSan Sebastian, PR 00685$60,498
7Vaquerias Varela Casablanca Inc.San Sebastian, PR 00685$51,993
8Empresas Agricolas La Victoria, Inc.San Sebastian, PR 00685$50,462
9Empresas Agricolas Rucajoan IncSan Sebastian, PR 00685$49,402
10Jose L Paoli FusterLares, PR 00669$48,657
11Carlos A Gonzalez SotoSan Sebastian, PR 00685$45,929
12Coriander CorpSan Sebastian, PR 00685$39,419
13Paoli Produce CorporationLares, PR 00669$37,678
14Miguel A Latorre CrespoSan Sebastian, PR 00685$35,549
15Frutas Del Campo IncLares, PR 00669$34,910
16Audeliz Cardona MendezSan Sebastian, PR 00685$34,860
17Ramirez Rivera Farm, Inc.San Sebastian, PR 00685$33,489
18Vaqueria Pura Brisa IncSan Sebastian, PR 00685$30,869
19Hacienda Loma Alta IncLares, PR 00669$30,862
20Gilberto Gonzalez PerezSan Sebastian, PR 00685$29,585

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag