Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 73
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Lares Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $229,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | , | $30,457 | |
2 | Fincas Emy, Inc. | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $16,406 |
3 | Gilberto Gonzalez Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $15,546 |
4 | Hacienda La Mia, Inc. | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $15,427 |
5 | , | $11,786 | |
6 | Getulio Guerra Nieves | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $11,251 |
7 | , | $7,321 | |
8 | Wilfredo Torres Negron | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $7,022 |
9 | Norberto Andres Rios Alicea | Lares, PR 00669 | $6,808 |
10 | Angel D Morales Velez | Lares, PR 00669 | $5,625 |
11 | Reymundo Rullan Rullan | Lares, PR 00669 | $5,625 |
12 | , | $5,089 | |
13 | Andy's Farm Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $5,043 |
14 | William Ramon Chaparro Nieves | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $4,919 |
15 | , | $4,345 | |
16 | Jose E Mendez Ruiz | Lares, PR 00669 | $3,847 |
17 | Leonardo Perez Morales | Castaner, PR 00631 | $3,824 |
18 | Angel L Fuster Acevedo | Castaner, PR 00631 | $3,564 |
19 | Aurea Esther Palau Torres | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $3,516 |
20 | Adela Miguel De Pena | Lares, PR 00669 | $3,028 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>