Total Emergency Relief Program in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 201
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $11,432,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wilson Velez Colon | Maricao, PR 00606 | $145,285 |
22 | Angel Luis Perez Barnecet | Maricao, PR 00606 | $142,823 |
23 | Helson Poggi Ruiz | Maricao, PR 00606 | $139,167 |
24 | Javier R Ramos Soto | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $138,042 |
25 | Daniel Medina Sanchez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $132,407 |
26 | Hacienda Iluminada LLC | Bayamon, PR 00956 | $131,355 |
27 | Luis A Ramirez Vazquez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $125,000 |
28 | Juan S Robles Nieves | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $125,000 |
29 | Santiago Giovanetti Fuster | Maricao, PR 00606 | $125,000 |
30 | Berros Tainos Inc | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $125,000 |
31 | Juan E Morel Valenzuela | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $123,606 |
32 | Luis A Lopez Ramos | Maricao, PR 00606 | $121,475 |
33 | Abnel Orta Soto | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $116,310 |
34 | Nelson Llaurador Perez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $115,697 |
35 | Finca Ebenezer, Inc | Maricao, PR 00606 | $114,902 |
36 | , | $114,005 | |
37 | Raul Cruz Perez | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $112,282 |
38 | Reino Lopez Duarte | Anasco, PR 00610 | $111,118 |
39 | Leonardo Vilella Perez | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $110,487 |
40 | , | $103,712 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”