Total Emergency Relief Program in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 201
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $11,432,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wilfred Ruiz Pacheco | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $102,624 |
42 | Luis Aviles Ruiz | Maricao, PR 00606 | $94,802 |
43 | Jose A Ruperto Muniz | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $91,261 |
44 | Rafael Rodriguez-rivera | Yauco, PR 00698 | $91,163 |
45 | Hector Mercado Ramos | Maricao, PR 00606 | $90,517 |
46 | Nelson Almonte Vilorio | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $87,855 |
47 | Julio Figaro Johnson | Mayaguez, PR 00680 | $85,112 |
48 | Fortunato Bonilla | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $83,764 |
49 | , | $82,760 | |
50 | Steffany Ruiz Laboy | Maricao, PR 00606 | $81,580 |
51 | Amelia Ruiz Ruiz | Maricao, PR 00606 | $81,031 |
52 | , | $80,063 | |
53 | Pedro Ortiz Rios | Yauco, PR 00698 | $74,279 |
54 | Juan Echevarria Garcia | Anasco, PR 00610 | $74,040 |
55 | Reinaldo Ruiz Feliciano | Maricao, PR 00606 | $73,915 |
56 | Finca El Pocito Dulce Inc | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $72,338 |
57 | Sucn Antonio Ruiz Garcia | Maricao, PR 00606 | $72,206 |
58 | Vidal J Rivera Montero | Guanica, PR 00653 | $71,517 |
59 | Hector Luis Santiago Curet | Maricao, PR 00606 | $68,772 |
60 | Wilfredo Guilloty Navarro | Mayaguez, PR 00681 | $68,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”