Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 156
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $1,075,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jorge Rullan Sanchez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $4,128 |
62 | Sigfredo Patino Chaparro | Aguada, PR 00602 | $4,068 |
63 | Pedro Ortiz Rios | Yauco, PR 00698 | $4,056 |
64 | , | $4,009 | |
65 | Juan Rosado Valle | Maricao, PR 00606 | $3,967 |
66 | Jaime Figueroa Caraballo | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $3,928 |
67 | Virgenmina Berrocales Lugo | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $3,927 |
68 | , | $3,926 | |
69 | Mariano Rivera Gonzalez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $3,842 |
70 | Heriberto Ruiz Sanchez | Maricao, PR 00606 | $3,680 |
71 | Javier R Ramos Soto | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $3,597 |
72 | Ulises Ruiz Vargas | Maricao, PR 00606 | $3,565 |
73 | Gilberto Torres Morales -jr | Mayaguez, PR 00681 | $3,491 |
74 | Aristel Berrocales Lebron | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $3,440 |
75 | Miguel Montalvo Torres | Castaner, PR 00631 | $3,418 |
76 | Juan Ruiz Perez | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $3,372 |
77 | Terra Inc | Mayaguez, PR 00682 | $3,288 |
78 | Maximino Comas Baez | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $3,064 |
79 | Neftali Mercado Feliciano | Maricao, PR 00606 | $3,058 |
80 | Pablo Quiles Perez | Las Marias, PR 00670 | $2,881 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”