Emergency Conservation Program in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 191
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $1,150,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Luis G Pena-santiago | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $72,176 |
2 | Rico Banana Inc | Cayey, PR 00736 | $53,576 |
3 | Pablo R Reyes Pabon | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $36,194 |
4 | Finca De Palmas En La Finca Del O | Aguas Buenas, PR 00703 | $31,773 |
5 | Caribbean Banana Inc | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $30,327 |
6 | Nubin Rullan Romero | Maricao, PR 00606 | $27,575 |
7 | Moises Davila Nieves | Aguirre, PR 00704 | $26,066 |
8 | Iluminado Pagan Marrero | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $24,868 |
9 | Ricardo Giuliani Marietti | Coto Laurel, PR 00780 | $18,825 |
10 | Ramon Santiago Rivera | Villalba, PR 00766 | $17,377 |
11 | Justo Rodriguez-rodriguez | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $17,338 |
12 | George Steidel Navarro | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $16,686 |
13 | , | $16,505 | |
14 | Feliciano Monclova-lebron | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $16,205 |
15 | Sanson Agricultural Corporation | Ponce, PR 00716 | $15,971 |
16 | Ramon Colon-rodriguez | Guayama, PR 00784 | $15,958 |
17 | Carlos B Vega-belen | Sabana Grande, PR 00637 | $15,462 |
18 | Juroma Farm Inc. | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $15,281 |
19 | Tropical Farm Corp | Lares, PR 00669 | $15,224 |
20 | Jose C Colon Franceschi | Villalba, PR 00766 | $15,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>