Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 310

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $7,125,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Mr Alberto Rodriguez HernandezSanta Isabel, PR 00757$69,198
22Apiarios Caraballo CorpYauco, PR 00698$66,027
23Orlando Escalera-alamoSanta Isabel, PR 00757$65,706
24Cas Produce CorpAguirre, PR 00704$63,349
25Finca De Palmas En La Finca Del OAguas Buenas, PR 00703$63,022
26Dya Del SurPonce, PR 00732$62,629
27Ramon Santiago RiveraVillalba, PR 00766$61,127
28N M Farms IncPonce, PR 00716$54,496
29Portagro Growers IncSanta Isabel, PR 00757$52,214
30Ag Agro IncSalinas, PR 00751$50,874
31Finca SurCoamo, PR 00769$49,462
32Luis Bonilla MartinezYauco, PR 00698$46,368
33Ramon A Guzman BermudezJuana Diaz, PR 00795$44,019
34Mr Jose Venancio Fabre LaboySabana Grande, PR 00637$40,130
35Finca Magdalena S EAguirre, PR 00704$38,557
36Pablo R Reyes PabonJuana Diaz, PR 00795$38,041
37Heriberto Colon SantosBarranquitas, PR 00794$36,683
38Marcos Santiago PadillaPonce, PR 00728$35,884
39Erk High Quality Products LLCSanta Isabel, PR 00757$35,853
40Jose M Montanez MilianPatillas, PR 00723$33,809

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag