Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $515,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | George Steidel Navarro | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $45,216 |
2 | Roberto Rodriguez Rodriguez | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $34,372 |
3 | Henry Steidel Navarro | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $32,568 |
4 | Martex Las Carolinas LLC | Salinas, PR 00751 | $32,343 |
5 | Cesar L De Jesus-ortiz | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $28,950 |
6 | Carlos R Cardona Ocasio | Patillas, PR 00723 | $27,140 |
7 | Nirca Nereida Del Moral Burgos | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $23,522 |
8 | Pedro Leon-cruz | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $21,712 |
9 | Ruben De Jesus-collazo | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $18,083 |
10 | Martex Farms S E | Carolina, PR 00984 | $18,005 |
11 | Everangel Orengo Montes | Yauco, PR 00698 | $16,415 |
12 | Luis Raul Steidel-ortiz | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $14,475 |
13 | Hector Leon Collazo | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $14,233 |
14 | Manuel Reyes Pabon | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $13,131 |
15 | Mr Tony Rivera Ortiz | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $12,665 |
16 | Jonathan Ortiz Bultron | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $12,650 |
17 | Solano Burgos Guzman | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $12,650 |
18 | , | $12,256 | |
19 | Santyomar Amaro Collazo | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $10,856 |
20 | Luis H Leon-leon | Maunabo, PR 00707 | $10,856 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>