Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) in Utuado Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 207
Recipients of Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) from farms in Utuado Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $396,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Pandemic Assistance Program (PARP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Filomeno Rivera Perez | Utuado, PR 00641 | $4,275 |
22 | Alberto Mendez Custodio | Utuado, PR 00641 | $4,055 |
23 | Miguel A Torres Diaz | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $3,975 |
24 | Marisabel Ramos Ramos | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $3,595 |
25 | Finca Las Treinta Inc. | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $3,553 |
26 | Caficultores San Patricio Inc | Adjuntas, PR 00601 | $3,503 |
27 | Marcos A Arce Ruiz | Florida, PR 00650 | $3,271 |
28 | Kenneth Rivera Zeda | Utuado, PR 00641 | $3,071 |
29 | Juan Jose Montalvo Arroyo | Utuado, PR 00641 | $3,050 |
30 | Felix Rivera Estate | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,996 |
31 | Luis A Velez Vargas | Florida, PR 00650 | $2,891 |
32 | Miguelina Pabon Chevere | Utuado, PR 00641 | $2,885 |
33 | Ramon Rios Cruz | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,768 |
34 | Teresa Rodriguez Vargas | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,736 |
35 | Jaime Gomez Rodriguez | Florida, PR 00650 | $2,716 |
36 | De Hoyos Farm LLC | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,698 |
37 | Rafael Salgado Colon | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,541 |
38 | Mario Garcia Ayala | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,534 |
39 | Ariel Ramos Soto | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,510 |
40 | Jaime L Reyes Morales | Jayuya, PR 00664 | $2,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”