Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne) totaled $160,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Milton Head Jr | Stapleton, AL 36578 | $2,912 |
22 | Timothy Lyle Barnhill | Loxley, AL 36551 | $2,881 |
23 | Albert M Thompson III | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $2,784 |
24 | Rosemary B Kaiser | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $2,641 |
25 | Charles Griffin Head | Stapleton, AL 36578 | $2,637 |
26 | Clarke C. Willaims - Clarke C Williams 2014 Revoca | Lewisville, NC 27023 | $2,500 |
27 | Bernice Elizabeth Malone | Chunchula, AL 36521 | $2,310 |
28 | , | $2,114 | |
29 | Madeline B Darby | Loxley, AL 36551 | $1,658 |
30 | Benny W Darby | Loxley, AL 36551 | $1,658 |
31 | Laura W Almaroad | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,542 |
32 | Thompson Commercial Properties LLC | Ellicott City, MD 21042 | $1,422 |
33 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,392 |
34 | Linda B Ellis | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $1,288 |
35 | Earl Boykin | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,283 |
36 | Vicki Ann Thompson | Bay Minette, AL 36507 | $1,252 |
37 | Eunice A Chavous | Milton, FL 32570 | $1,199 |
38 | George W Woodyard | Saint Stephens, AL 36569 | $1,196 |
39 | Kenneth L Waters | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $1,172 |
40 | Glenn Kornegay | Loxley, AL 36551 | $1,135 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”