Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Alabama
(Rep. Bradley Byrne)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,487
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne) totaled $224,877,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $12,187,192 |
2 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $5,841,786 |
3 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $5,733,364 |
4 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $5,417,347 |
5 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $4,746,570 |
6 | Moseley Farm | Leroy, AL 36548 | $3,963,437 |
7 | Sessions Farm | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $3,915,018 |
8 | Dorland Farms | Mobile, AL 36695 | $3,267,709 |
9 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $3,214,635 |
10 | Dorland Farms | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $2,895,136 |
11 | Corte Land & Cattle Co | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $2,831,712 |
12 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $2,742,651 |
13 | David W Harms | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $2,684,255 |
14 | Moravec St Elmo Farms | St Elmo, AL 36568 | $2,639,651 |
15 | Penry Farms Inc | Daphne, AL 36526 | $2,630,385 |
16 | Bartl Farms | Elberta, AL 36530 | $2,613,682 |
17 | Lehmann Farms | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $2,411,663 |
18 | A A Bertolla Farms LLC | Daphne, AL 36526 | $2,242,529 |
19 | Griffiths Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $2,168,089 |
20 | James Lipscomb & Sons Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $2,022,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>