Market Loss Assistance Program in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 451
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne) totaled $6,726,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Paul Mcdaniel | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $38,134 |
42 | John Krupinski | Foley, AL 36535 | $36,573 |
43 | Griffiths Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $35,513 |
44 | James Lipscomb & Sons Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $35,080 |
45 | Arnold Mazel | Silverhill, AL 36576 | $34,444 |
46 | David Lazzari | Loxley, AL 36551 | $34,331 |
47 | Ching Dairy | Semmes, AL 36575 | $33,898 |
48 | Allegri Farm | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $32,365 |
49 | Street Brothers Inc | Fairhope, AL 36532 | $32,113 |
50 | Terrell Middleton | Mobile, AL 36608 | $31,811 |
51 | Donald E Salac | Summerdale, AL 36580 | $31,115 |
52 | Cleverdon Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $30,850 |
53 | Freeland Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $29,916 |
54 | Jessie H House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $28,177 |
55 | Larry Wayne House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $28,177 |
56 | Mary Jane House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $28,177 |
57 | Maureen House | Uriah, AL 36480 | $28,177 |
58 | Leonard Cecchi | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $28,068 |
59 | Salac Family Limited Partnership | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $27,110 |
60 | James H Middleton | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $27,058 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”