Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Alabama
(Rep. Martha Roby)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,129
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $39,647,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chris Thompson Farms Gp | Midland City, AL 36350 | $540,948 |
2 | Auston Lane Walden | Daleville, AL 36322 | $535,781 |
3 | Birdsong Farms | Hartford, AL 36344 | $522,339 |
4 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $425,820 |
5 | Sumblin Farm | Kinston, AL 36453 | $384,383 |
6 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $383,813 |
7 | Colby Willoughby | Gordon, AL 36376 | $366,232 |
8 | Greg Bryant | Bellwood, AL 36313 | $348,448 |
9 | S & B Farms | Samson, AL 36477 | $320,196 |
10 | Pitchford Farms | Columbia, AL 36319 | $317,302 |
11 | Woodham Cattle Company LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $315,626 |
12 | Frank E Albright | Elba, AL 36323 | $311,006 |
13 | Jv & P Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $289,969 |
14 | Hayden Nobles | Kinston, AL 36453 | $280,641 |
15 | Ingalls Farms | Ashford, AL 36312 | $277,634 |
16 | Marty Marshall Farms Partnership | Headland, AL 36345 | $277,623 |
17 | James W Stephens Jr | Elba, AL 36323 | $269,795 |
18 | H & K Farms | Rehobeth, AL 36301 | $267,552 |
19 | Parkerhill Farms | Taylor, AL 36301 | $262,647 |
20 | Barton Willoughby | Gordon, AL 36343 | $261,907 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>