Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,131
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $3,510,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J A Wise And Son Farms Inc | Samson, AL 36477 | $21,844 |
22 | Mark Donnell Farms | Daleville, AL 36322 | $21,156 |
23 | Anne S Sumblin | Kinston, AL 36453 | $20,773 |
24 | Adams Farms Partnership | Newville, AL 36353 | $20,528 |
25 | J Michael Deshazo | Newville, AL 36353 | $20,450 |
26 | Joe Mack Powell Jr | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $20,298 |
27 | Long Farms LLC | Banks, AL 36005 | $20,296 |
28 | Clay E Ellenburg | Newton, AL 36352 | $20,174 |
29 | Ben P Hughes | Coffee Springs, AL 36318 | $20,066 |
30 | Huguley Farms Inc | Coffee Springs, AL 36318 | $19,792 |
31 | Margaret Lindsey | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $19,416 |
32 | River View Farms LLC | Goshen, AL 36035 | $19,408 |
33 | K & E Farms Inc | Headland, AL 36345 | $18,750 |
34 | Susie Skinner | Hartford, AL 36344 | $18,332 |
35 | Jarvis Skinner | Hartford, AL 36344 | $18,332 |
36 | Jeffrey Watkins | Hartford, AL 36344 | $18,253 |
37 | Gary Tim Sumblin | Kinston, AL 36453 | $18,202 |
38 | Danny Ellison | Headland, AL 36345 | $17,839 |
39 | Kelly Farms | Hartford, AL 36344 | $17,564 |
40 | Edward E Strickland | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $17,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”