Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,881
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $137,405,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Tri-county Properties LLC | Dothan, AL 36304 | $308,218 |
42 | Tommy W Baxley | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $305,378 |
43 | Laura Jean Rivenbark | Hartford, AL 36344 | $304,997 |
44 | West Family Farm LLC | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $304,599 |
45 | Dale H Davis | Goshen, AL 36035 | $296,348 |
46 | Jo Anne Denman | Gulf Shores, AL 36547 | $289,473 |
47 | Anthony C Drake | Montgomery, AL 36111 | $279,656 |
48 | Brantley Gin Company | Brantley, AL 36009 | $279,459 |
49 | Ted L Helms Jr | Dothan, AL 36304 | $273,612 |
50 | Leo Harden | Orange, VA 22960 | $271,165 |
51 | William Nathan Mathis | Newton, AL 36352 | $270,250 |
52 | Hardwick Farms LLC | Dothan, AL 36303 | $266,791 |
53 | Mallie C Sellers | Cowarts, AL 36321 | $264,531 |
54 | J W Mckenzie | Samson, AL 36477 | $263,723 |
55 | John Mark Johnson Estate | Geneva, AL 36340 | $255,311 |
56 | James R Sexton | Luverne, AL 36049 | $247,425 |
57 | Sconyers And Son Farms Inc | Geneva, AL 36340 | $246,142 |
58 | Carl T Jones Jr | Newville, AL 36353 | $244,367 |
59 | Stephen E Mathis | Cottonwood, AL 36320 | $242,935 |
60 | C Hugo Phillips | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $242,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”