Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Alabama
(Rep. Mike Rogers)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Alabama (Rep. Mike Rogers), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Alabama (Rep. Mike Rogers) totaled $635,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | George Mahlon Richburg | Auburn, AL 36830 | $852 |
62 | Nancy Wix | Wedowee, AL 36278 | $844 |
63 | Timothy B Coe | Wedowee, AL 36278 | $666 |
64 | Vicki H Noordermeer | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $641 |
65 | Joe R Robertson | Auburn, AL 36879 | $581 |
66 | Anthony Pike | Roanoke, AL 36274 | $543 |
67 | Christopher Neal Langley Jr | Camp Hill, AL 36850 | $543 |
68 | Amelia Crow | Jacksonville, AL 36265 | $517 |
69 | Phillip M Hendrix | Ranburne, AL 36273 | $441 |
70 | , | $437 | |
71 | Alvin Weston Starr | Auburn, AL 36832 | $434 |
72 | Floyd Starr III | Auburn, AL 36830 | $434 |
73 | Ricky Keith Murphy | Woodland, AL 36280 | $367 |
74 | Linda Henry Dean | Auburn, AL 36830 | $348 |
75 | Nancy L Henry | New York, NY 10010 | $348 |
76 | Lcl Limited Partnership | Selma, AL 36702 | $279 |
77 | Carolyn S Lord | Opelika, AL 36801 | $271 |
78 | Michael W Lord | Opelika, AL 36801 | $271 |
79 | Charles F Clark | Jacksonville, AL 36265 | $264 |
80 | Mary O Finney | Mountain Brk, AL 35213 | $252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”