Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 4th District of Alabama (Rep. Robert Aderholt) totaled $133,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dale Hester | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $520 |
22 | , | $520 | |
23 | James Clyde Bingham | Tuscumbia, AL 35674 | $429 |
24 | Jeffery Wayne Martin | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $404 |
25 | Mr Exie Jonathan Spears | Detroit, AL 35552 | $305 |
26 | , | $305 | |
27 | Hope Elizabeth Hudson | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $264 |
28 | Tabatha Lolley | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $256 |
29 | Freida Fowler | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $239 |
30 | Rita Wilson | Vina, AL 35593 | $239 |
31 | Robin Hardin | Guin, AL 35563 | $231 |
32 | Evelyn D Logan | Double Springs, AL 35553 | $215 |
33 | Beverly Stewart | Arley, AL 35541 | $215 |
34 | Jeanine Robinson | Addison, AL 35540 | $215 |
35 | Betty Baccus | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $198 |
36 | Kathy Wiginton | Hodges, AL 35571 | $190 |
37 | Sondra Sandlin | Winfield, AL 35594 | $190 |
38 | Blanche Rodgers | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $165 |
39 | Rhonda Miller | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $165 |
40 | Madonna Kim Mccarty | Eldridge, AL 35554 | $165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”